1996
DOI: 10.1117/12.241210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Estimating the degrees of freedom for a common CFAR detector</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Gaussian distributions, the resulting quantile would be + zs, where Za 5 the 1 -quantile of a standard Gaussian distribution. Contrast that to (2). When n = 64 and c = iO, the actual false alarm rate with this substitution approach is 23 times the desired value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of Gaussian distributions, the resulting quantile would be + zs, where Za 5 the 1 -quantile of a standard Gaussian distribution. Contrast that to (2). When n = 64 and c = iO, the actual false alarm rate with this substitution approach is 23 times the desired value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…4 One simple situation is the Gaussian white noise situation, where F is a Gaussian distribution with unknown mean and variance, and y and all the v's are independent. Then the choice C = t:i + s(1 + 1/n)'/2ta,ni (2) satisfies (1) exactly, where ti = v, = (n -1)_i 1(v -)2, and tan_i is the critical value for a Student's t-distribution with n -1 degrees of freedom. Then P(y > C) = P( 3" > tan_i) = 8v 1+1/n In this discussion we consider possible methods when • there is dependence among the v's • there is dependence between y and the v's • the distribution is non-Gaussian, with known shape, and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%