1995
DOI: 10.1117/12.208325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Evaluation of fiber optic sensors for space vehicle health management</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FOS have recently been considered to offer several bene ts in reusable cryogenic tank applications. 5,6 Implementation of FOS can be especiallyeffectivefor reusable composite tanks because they can be easily embedded into composite tank wall during the manufacturing process without degrading mechanical performance and can be an integral part of composite tank structure. Furthermore, the sensors can operate in a wide temperature range, from cryogenic temperatures up to 500-600 ± C and survive the harsh space environment, while providing an accurate measurements of strain, temperature, and other factors affecting the tanks.…”
Section: Fiber Optic Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FOS have recently been considered to offer several bene ts in reusable cryogenic tank applications. 5,6 Implementation of FOS can be especiallyeffectivefor reusable composite tanks because they can be easily embedded into composite tank wall during the manufacturing process without degrading mechanical performance and can be an integral part of composite tank structure. Furthermore, the sensors can operate in a wide temperature range, from cryogenic temperatures up to 500-600 ± C and survive the harsh space environment, while providing an accurate measurements of strain, temperature, and other factors affecting the tanks.…”
Section: Fiber Optic Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies correlating embedded EFPI's and surface mounted strain gages were found to be inconsistent. For example, Miller 5 , Andrews and Zisk 14 , and Lee et al 5 have reported good accuracy with embedded EFPI's compared to strain gages. In contrast, an experimental investigation conducted by Carman et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%