1997
DOI: 10.1117/12.271312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human observer performance</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the assumption that radiologists know what a healthy brain image should be like and refer to it in their mind during the diagnostic process, we take an image acquired from a healthy person as Reference image and the same image with simulated signals (modeled by Eq. (3)) as Distorted image, as Jackson did in [26]. Thus, the VDP actually predicts the probability that the signal is visible in radiologists' perceptual domain.…”
Section: B Candidate Selectionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the assumption that radiologists know what a healthy brain image should be like and refer to it in their mind during the diagnostic process, we take an image acquired from a healthy person as Reference image and the same image with simulated signals (modeled by Eq. (3)) as Distorted image, as Jackson did in [26]. Thus, the VDP actually predicts the probability that the signal is visible in radiologists' perceptual domain.…”
Section: B Candidate Selectionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The HVS models used in the evaluation of medical image quality [10]- [12], [26]- [28] belong to the perceptual difference model (PDM) [29]- [33] focusing on the spatial contrast detection. They are especially efficient for the detection of near-visibility-threshold distortion, suitable for the diagnostic task performance evaluation where the detection targets are not too conspicuous.…”
Section: B Existing Numerical Observersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower JNDs represent higher fidelity. 19 The JND tools have been reported to be a better predictor of human observer performance than parameters such as peak signal-tonoise ratio or mean-squared error. 34,35 The JNDmetrix visual system model has predicted and correlated highly with radiologists' performance in using softcopy display monitors with different phosphors 13 and on-axis viewing liquid crystal display displays compared with CRT viewing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A JND value of 1.0 is defined as a 75% probability that a human observer will notice a difference between the 2 images. 19 Authors (H.L. and J.F.F.-A.)…”
Section: Just-noticeable Differencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since long ago, ROC theory has been applied to analyze signal detectability and discrimination data [1-3, to assess image quality [4,5], ], to measure performance of human observers [6][7][8], and to evaluate diagnostic systems [9][10][11]. An interesting characteristic of ROC theory is that it provides a detectability (or performance) index (d') that is independent of the circumstances that "force" the observer to set his (her) criterion at a particular point of the variable decision axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%