1995
DOI: 10.1117/12.213718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Failure characterization of nodular defects in multilayer dielectric coatings</title>

Abstract: Thisisrpreprintofrpinteuded for publication ina journalorpmceedings. Since changes may be made before publication, this preprint is made available with the understandmg titat it will not be cited or reproduced without the permission of the author.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 More elaborate calculations taking into account the electric field enhancements by nodular defects 24,25 have also been performed. However, these more sophisticated calculations only apply to normal incidence.…”
Section: Electric Field Distribution In a Perfect Multilayermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 More elaborate calculations taking into account the electric field enhancements by nodular defects 24,25 have also been performed. However, these more sophisticated calculations only apply to normal incidence.…”
Section: Electric Field Distribution In a Perfect Multilayermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser damage in thin films has consistently been associated with the presence of these nodular defects [3,4]. A simple parabolic model similar to the nodule geometry is widely used by researchers [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Electric field enhancements induced by nodular defects with different sizes, depths, and shapes have been studied based on this simple model [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nodular ejection happens when the thermal-induced stress caused by the electric field exceeds the yield stress of the film surface. A simple simulation about stress was presented based on the simple model [9,10]. An atomic force microscope [11], scanning electron microscope (SEM) [12], and photothermal microscope [13] have been used to characterize nodules before and after laser irradiation, and a correlation was observed between nodule height and geometries with the damage sensitivity [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the jEj 2 distribution determines the spatial distribution of the absorbed laser energy in the area surrounding a nodule, knowledge of which is an important precondition to understanding the subsequent complex processes of temperature distribution, stress response and mechanical damage. 19 Without clear knowledge of the jEj 2 distributions and of how those distributions affect the damage behavior of nodules, it is impossible to gain a true understanding of the thermomechanical damage process of nodules. The reason why previous studies failed to find a dependence of nodular damage on jEj 2 distributions is easy to explain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%