2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.429354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>High-resolution noncontact thermal characterization of semiconductor devices</title>

Abstract: Non-contact optical methods can be used for sub micron surface thermal characterization of active semiconductor devices. Point measurements were first made, and then real time thermal images were acquired with a specialized PINarray detector. This method of thermal imaging can have spatial resolution better than the diffraction limit of an infrared camera and can work in a wide range of ambient temperatures. The experimentally obtained thermal resolution is on the order of 50mK.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those studies demonstrated a cooling power density of 93.8 W/cm for a 200-m-thick BiTe TE element (one of the thinnest TE elements found in the market, BiTe materials properties are collected from the Thermion company datasheet) [23]. The simulated results matched well with the reported value by the manufacturer [20]. This also conforms to the conclusion: 3-D silicon microrefrigerator has a higher cooling power density than conventional 1-D devices with the same thickness.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experiments and Simulationssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those studies demonstrated a cooling power density of 93.8 W/cm for a 200-m-thick BiTe TE element (one of the thinnest TE elements found in the market, BiTe materials properties are collected from the Thermion company datasheet) [23]. The simulated results matched well with the reported value by the manufacturer [20]. This also conforms to the conclusion: 3-D silicon microrefrigerator has a higher cooling power density than conventional 1-D devices with the same thickness.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experiments and Simulationssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We use differential thermocouples to measure the temperature difference: one thermocouple tip is on top of the device and the other one on the substrate far away from device. We tested temperature variation versus time of this set-up and got a maximum value of 0.05 C. The comparison of thermocouple measurements with the non-contact optical measurement technique was described in an earlier study [20]. Thermocouple data is accurate within 0.1 C. Even though the thermocouple is on the order of the microrefrigerator size, since the cooling power density is very large, heat conduction through thermocouple wires is negligible.…”
Section: Device Cooling Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermoreflectance method for observing the change in reflectance with temperature change is widely known. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] In these studies, lights in the visible light region are used. Thus, these lights are invasive for semiconductor devices in an operating state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration for each material's thermoreflectance coefficient is necessary using an in-situ method [9][10][11], typically with an external heating source (e.g., micro-peltier device) and sensor (e.g., Microthermocouple).We have previously demonstrated that by cycling the device at various frequencies and with the use of [1] a fast fourier tansform (FFT) algorithm operating on a series of frames from a CCD camera, the magnitude and phase information of the thermal signal is obtained with good signal to noise (SNR). Analysis in the frequency domain is used to reduce broadband noise and is a convenient way to extract the small thermoreflectance signal.…”
Section: Differential Thermoreflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermoreflectance imaging is a proven effective non contact, non-destructive thermal characterization method that is based on the very small (~10 -4 ) temperature dependence of material reflection coefficients. Temperature resolution to 10-50 mK has been demonstrated using this method [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Because thermoreflectance imaging uses visible light (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%