1992
DOI: 10.1117/12.143964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Image coding methods and their assessment</title>

Abstract: Image coding methods continue to be introduced without satisfactorily answering the question, "which compression method is best for a given set of conditions?" This paper provides a framework for comparing and contrasting seemingly unrelated methods and then addresses the remaining issue, "which metric should be used?" IMAGE COMPRESSION METHODS Generic image compression modelWe will first present a general model for image compression and decompression so that the many, seemingly unrelated, algorithms can be br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Common faults of MSB are that a slight shift of an image causes a large numerical error but no visual distortion and, conversely, a small spatially concentrated numerical error can be an important visual artifact [2,3]. It is common to normalize this distortion in some way to produce a dimensionless measure of quality and to describe the result in decibels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common faults of MSB are that a slight shift of an image causes a large numerical error but no visual distortion and, conversely, a small spatially concentrated numerical error can be an important visual artifact [2,3]. It is common to normalize this distortion in some way to produce a dimensionless measure of quality and to describe the result in decibels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%