2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.735202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Joint MAP bias estimation and data association: algorithms</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(14) and (15) exhibits a comprehensive consideration of multiple factors, including the difference between local tracks, the tolerant extent of non-rigid transformation and the appearance of unpaired tracks. Moreover, the constraints that the correspondence matrix needs to satisfy were specified explicitly.…”
Section: Original Tps-rpm Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(14) and (15) exhibits a comprehensive consideration of multiple factors, including the difference between local tracks, the tolerant extent of non-rigid transformation and the appearance of unpaired tracks. Moreover, the constraints that the correspondence matrix needs to satisfy were specified explicitly.…”
Section: Original Tps-rpm Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A joint track association and relative bias estimation problem was formulated and a solution based on the Dijkstra search was developed in [13]. A solution based on the branch-and-bound framework for the same problem was described in [14]. Another joint method was proposed in [15] which achieves the maximum likelihood estimates for relative bias and date association based on the Murty's K-best algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An integrated way may be promising to implement data association and bias estimation jointly. Related work about this topic can be found in [17][18][19], where the sensor biases are assumed to be a direct additive term on local estimates, and only relative biases can be estimated. In addition, in the case of detection probability less than one, the target sets detected by different sensors do not coincide.…”
Section: Extension To the Multi-target Case Or The Case Of Detection mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An integrated way may be promising to implement data association and bias estimation jointly. Related work about this topic can be found in [17–19], where the sensor biases are assumed to be a direct additive term on local estimates, and only relative biases can be estimated.…”
Section: Proposed Approach To Sensor Registration and Track Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, more attention has been paid to the joint association and bias removal approaches [7]- [10]. These approaches, which formulate a nonconvex mixed integer nonlinear programming problem, are usually difficult to solve [8], [9]. There are some proposed algorithms using the iterative strategy that performs TTTA and registration alternately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%