1998
DOI: 10.1117/12.328457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>NIST virtual/physical random-profile roughness calibration standards</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the reference standard can be an SI unit, a certified reference material (CRM) [14]-such as the NIST standard reference materials (SRM) [15,16], or a standardized measurement procedure error rate [10] (or likelihood ratio LR [11]) when the CMC result (or LR) is higher than a threshold, or it may be concluded as an elimination with a stated false-negative error rate [10] (or LR [11])…”
Section: Development and Application Of The Cmc Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the reference standard can be an SI unit, a certified reference material (CRM) [14]-such as the NIST standard reference materials (SRM) [15,16], or a standardized measurement procedure error rate [10] (or likelihood ratio LR [11]) when the CMC result (or LR) is higher than a threshold, or it may be concluded as an elimination with a stated false-negative error rate [10] (or LR [11])…”
Section: Development and Application Of The Cmc Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument is the unknown factor to be verified, calibrated for traceable measurements. According to the VIM/BIPM [14], the reference standard can be an SI unit, a certified reference material (CRM) [14]—such as the NIST standard reference materials (SRM) [15,16], or a standardized measurement procedure [14]. Measurement: The calibrated instrument is then used for measuring the measurand with metrological traceability [14] through the established reference standard to the SI unit.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteria Standard and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1965, Häsing and his team developed random profile roughness specimens with Ra range from 0.15 to 1.5 µm at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB, the German national metrology institute) (Braunschweig, Germany). Since then, the specimens developed at PTB have been widely used in the European calibration network and other researchers, like Song and Krüger, have designed other profiles that are currently gathered under Type D of ISO 5436 [18,19]. Another important national metrology institute, the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) (Teddington, UK) in the UK produces certain types of standard also focused on the traceability and the maintenance of the traceability chain [2,20].…”
Section: Commercial Surface Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Precision Engineering Division at NIST has a long history of developing surface roughness specimens [ 6 9 ]. In 1998, a virtual/physical random profile surface roughness standard was developed at NIST using a numerically controlled (NC) diamond turning process [ 9 ].…”
Section: A Virtual/physical Bullet Profile Signature Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Precision Engineering Division at NIST has a long history of developing surface roughness specimens [ 6 9 ]. In 1998, a virtual/physical random profile surface roughness standard was developed at NIST using a numerically controlled (NC) diamond turning process [ 9 ]. Based on the same NC diamond turning technique for manufacturing random profile roughness specimens, two prototype standard bullets were developed in April 1998 [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: A Virtual/physical Bullet Profile Signature Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%