2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.475507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Nonlinear damage models for diagnosis and prognosis in structural dynamic systems</title>

Abstract: This work aims to establish a nonlinear dynamics framework for diagnosis and prognosis in structural dynamic systems. The objective is to develop an analytically sound means for extracting features, which can be used to characterize damage, from modal-based input-output data in complex hybrid structures with heterogeneous materials and many components. Although systems like this are complex in nature, the premise of the work here is that damage initiates and evolves in the same phenomenological way regardless … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model-based approaches typically involve building models (or mathematical functions) to describe the physics of the system states and failure modes; they incorporate physical understanding of the system into the estimation of system state and/or remaining useful life (RUL) (Adams, 2002;Luo et al, 2003;Chelidze and Cusumano, 2004). Model-based approaches, however, may not be suitable for many industrial applications where the physical parameters and fault modes may vary under different operation conditions (Pecht and Jaai, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model-based approaches typically involve building models (or mathematical functions) to describe the physics of the system states and failure modes; they incorporate physical understanding of the system into the estimation of system state and/or remaining useful life (RUL) (Adams, 2002;Luo et al, 2003;Chelidze and Cusumano, 2004). Model-based approaches, however, may not be suitable for many industrial applications where the physical parameters and fault modes may vary under different operation conditions (Pecht and Jaai, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adams [20] proposed to model damage accumulation in a structural dynamic system as first/second order nonlinear differential equations.…”
Section: B Model Based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another principal disadvantage of data-driven methods is that the prognostic reasoning process is usually opaque to users [6]; consequently, they sometimes are not suitable for some applications where forecast reasoning transparency is required. Physics-based approaches typically involve building models (or mathematical functions) to describe the physics of the system states and failure modes; they incorporate physical understanding of the system into the estimation of system state and/or RUL [7][8][9]. Physics-based approaches, however, may not be suitable for some applications where the physical parameters and fault modes may vary under different operation conditions [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%