1999
DOI: 10.1117/12.348691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Optimal sensor locations for structures with multiple loading conditions</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A resulting inverse problem has to be solved. Natural frequencies and mode shapes are often used for assessing damage (Ettouney et al, 1999;Yang and Lee, 1999). Anti-resonance frequencies can improve the accuracy of damage predictions (Williams and Messina, 1999).…”
Section: Vdm Versus Model-updating Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A resulting inverse problem has to be solved. Natural frequencies and mode shapes are often used for assessing damage (Ettouney et al, 1999;Yang and Lee, 1999). Anti-resonance frequencies can improve the accuracy of damage predictions (Williams and Messina, 1999).…”
Section: Vdm Versus Model-updating Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the variability of the location of the loading source has not been well investigated. We illustrate how the optimal locations of sensors (issues related to Section II) in a complex engineering structure are determined by citing Ettouney et al's paper [106]. They investigate a suspension bridge (Fig.…”
Section: A Structural Damage Monitoring and Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the number and location of sensors, number of structural degrees of freedom, number of tests, and number of structural modes. Almost all of these studies assume that the location and the magnitude of damage are known a priori, before locating the sensors [106]. However, the variability of the location of the loading source has not been well investigated.…”
Section: A Structural Damage Monitoring and Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation