1999
DOI: 10.1117/12.373167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Performance limitations of a four-channel polarimeter in the presence of detection noise</title>

Abstract: We examine the performance limitations of a four-channel polarimeter in the presence of detection noise for arbitrary light levels. We treat the case where the light exiting the polarimeter is detected by a photon counting sensor at each of the four channels. Specifically, we theoretically describe the propagation of detection noise through the polarimeter calibration matrix. The variances in the four estimated Stokes vector components, both orthogonal intensities and mutual phase delay are theoretically predi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to diminish the effect of noise in the final measurements, some studies have been carried out [7,[13][14][15][16][17]. For instance, different indicators as the condition number (CN) [18] or the equally weighted variance (EWV) [7] have been used in optimization procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to diminish the effect of noise in the final measurements, some studies have been carried out [7,[13][14][15][16][17]. For instance, different indicators as the condition number (CN) [18] or the equally weighted variance (EWV) [7] have been used in optimization procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of OSC estimation has been widely addressed with different types of noise, such as for example speckle noise, coupled photon and speckle noise, and detector noise [12][13][14]. More recently, we addressed the case of additive and signal-dependent photon noise [15], which presents great similarities with the case of additive Gaussian noise [16].…”
Section: Description Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%