2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.475627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Refractive index of <emph type="1">escherichia coli</emph> cells</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, mCherryTYG is quite pH selective, and it is not affected by differences in monovalent salts, divalent salts, or redox (Figure S2). Alternatively, the overall decrease in lifetime is consistent with the higher index of refraction of cellular environments, which have been measured to cause lifetime shifts of up to ∼0.5 ns compared to dilute protein solutions. , Notably, in live cells, the mCherryTYG fluorescence is only partially quenched at pH 5.5, and fluorescence is still easily detectable for lifetime measurements. Thus, mCherryTYG is a well-behaved pH sensor that retains its p K a in live cells with an exceedingly large fluorescence lifetime dynamic range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, mCherryTYG is quite pH selective, and it is not affected by differences in monovalent salts, divalent salts, or redox (Figure S2). Alternatively, the overall decrease in lifetime is consistent with the higher index of refraction of cellular environments, which have been measured to cause lifetime shifts of up to ∼0.5 ns compared to dilute protein solutions. , Notably, in live cells, the mCherryTYG fluorescence is only partially quenched at pH 5.5, and fluorescence is still easily detectable for lifetime measurements. Thus, mCherryTYG is a well-behaved pH sensor that retains its p K a in live cells with an exceedingly large fluorescence lifetime dynamic range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Light intensity fluctuations can be attributed to two main sources: first, the absorption of the laser light by a bacterium, and second, refraction of light at the boundary of the bacterium, caused by the difference in the refractive indices of the cell and the surrounding medium. Typical values of the refractive index for E.coli are 1.39 ± 0.05, while values for LB medium have been reported as 1.335 ± 0.03 ( 2022 ). Light travelling through a bacterium is absorbed more than in the surrounding liquid, a property which is typically used in cell counting experiments by optical density (OD) measurements ( 23–25 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the bacterium is attached to the surface of the graphene and is likely to be in the laser beam path. The refractive index of an E. coli bacterium 39,40 (n = 1.33) is very close to that of the LB medium (n = 1.34), causing the bacteria to be nearly transparent and therefore we estimate this to have negligible impact on the nanomotion amplitude determination.…”
Section: Amplitude Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 92%