1995
DOI: 10.1117/12.208339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Simulation of the imaging performance of x-ray image intensifier/TV camera chains</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In image-intensifier/video pickup tube-based systems image lag is signal dependent, 18,46,47 which makes it difficult to incorporate temporal filtering algorithms. The DQE performance of the imager is comparable with that achieved by image intensifier based fluoroscopic systems at low spatial frequencies [13][14][15][16]18,20 and show a significant improvement at mid-to high-spatial frequencies. 14 -16,18 The limiting resolution of this prototype imager is either comparable [19][20][21]48 or slightly better 22 than that reported with amorphous silicon-based flat-panel fluoroscopy devices depending on the implemented pixel pitch and the scintillator used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In image-intensifier/video pickup tube-based systems image lag is signal dependent, 18,46,47 which makes it difficult to incorporate temporal filtering algorithms. The DQE performance of the imager is comparable with that achieved by image intensifier based fluoroscopic systems at low spatial frequencies [13][14][15][16]18,20 and show a significant improvement at mid-to high-spatial frequencies. 14 -16,18 The limiting resolution of this prototype imager is either comparable [19][20][21]48 or slightly better 22 than that reported with amorphous silicon-based flat-panel fluoroscopy devices depending on the implemented pixel pitch and the scintillator used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Such objective measures detailing the performance of imaging systems developed for mammography [1][2][3][4] and radiography [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] have been reported. Similar measures of image quality for fluoroscopic imaging systems based on image intensifiers, [13][14][15][16][17] amorphous silicon, 18 -22 amorphous selenium, 7,[23][24][25][26] and CCDs coupled to scintillator using fiberoptic tapers 27,28 have also been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Such analysis has been shown to accurately describe the signal and noise performance of other imaging systems. 6,7 The model requires that the system have a linear ͑or linearizable͒ and shift-invariant signal response. In addition, image noise is expressed in terms of the noise power spectrum, which requires that the noise processes be stationary.…”
Section: A Cascaded Linear Systems Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cunningham et al 11 and Westmore et al 16 discussed the technique in relation to a hypothetical system composed of a change-coupled device ͑CCD͒ camera and a luminescent phosphor. Spekowius et al 7 applied similar formalism in describing the transfer characteristics of an x-ray image intensifier ͑XRII͒ system. Maidment and Yaffe 17 demonstrated the applicability of such analysis by measuring the DQE of a scanned-slot mammographic imager, and Bissonette et al 6 applied a cascaded systems model in describing the DQE of a video-based portal imaging system.…”
Section: Quantum Accounting Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the modulation transfer function characteristics of the phosphor-based indirect detectors, structured scintillators, such as the columnar growth CsI, are generally used. 26,28,29 Hence, the optical scattering at the top surface of the columnar CsI growth, 30,31 the grain boundaries, and the disorder structure 32 can cause spatial sensitivity variations. Therefore, the acquired images are affected by the fixed pattern noise due to the nonuniform gains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%