1994
DOI: 10.1117/12.174284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Statistical processes limiting the noise of a screen-film system</title>

Abstract: As new generations ofscreen-film systems tend toward idealpeifonnance when evaluated by fundamental information theoretic criteria, there has been a natural increase of interest in identifying and controlling those remaining statisticalprocesses which are present during imaging but which have no essential role in image transfer, and which are thus manifest in an increase in the output image noise level.In the present contribution we have investigated the nature and role of the probability distribution function… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy dependence of the photon attenuation coefficients includes a term proportional to E −3 responsible for photoelectric absorption and a constant fraction responsible for the Compton effect (Beutel et al 2000). Therefore, for small lesions and calcifications, the energy dependence of the weighting factor in (5) can also be expressed analytically as w(E) = aE −3 + b, where a and b are the empirical coefficients that depend on the density, effective Z and atomic number of the background and contrast material.…”
Section: Proposed Msms Breast Ct Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy dependence of the photon attenuation coefficients includes a term proportional to E −3 responsible for photoelectric absorption and a constant fraction responsible for the Compton effect (Beutel et al 2000). Therefore, for small lesions and calcifications, the energy dependence of the weighting factor in (5) can also be expressed analytically as w(E) = aE −3 + b, where a and b are the empirical coefficients that depend on the density, effective Z and atomic number of the background and contrast material.…”
Section: Proposed Msms Breast Ct Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photon counting detector could improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to the rejection of electronics noise by setting an optimal threshold level. It is also free of pulse height (Swank) noise (Beutel et al 2000) which further increases the SNR. The energy-resolved detector can count the x-ray photons with different energies separately, and corresponding digital data can be stored, and post-processed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal threshold values estimated form the composite LSF method were verified against the expected values determined from the standard s-curve calibration method from threshold scans [8]. Finally, the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) given by the modulus of the Fourier transform of the LSF [15] has been calculated for the various thresholds and photon energies. For an ideal LSF, represented by a box function, the MTF can be expressed as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last year, at this same conference, we presented a paper [1] which was the result of an experimental attempt to understand the behavior ofthe probability distribution functions associated with imaging noise resulting from direct light exposures and screen/film exposures at various conversion efficiencies. Conventional wisdom led us to believe that the effect of so-called quantum mottle could be varied in terms of a broadening of the probability distribution function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%