1999
DOI: 10.1117/12.357699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Transparent object analysis in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer using the multiplicative analogical moire phase-shifting method</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0 and c 3 = −1) and the calculated results, Y φ MI (x, y) and N φ MI (x, y), are put into equation (10), with the aim of obtaining the principal values φ G (x, y) of phase increment. On the other hand, the latter values are obtained directly if a set of selected phase-shifted moiré images is combined at the same time in the two-plus-two-point DPSAs, equations (11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…0 and c 3 = −1) and the calculated results, Y φ MI (x, y) and N φ MI (x, y), are put into equation (10), with the aim of obtaining the principal values φ G (x, y) of phase increment. On the other hand, the latter values are obtained directly if a set of selected phase-shifted moiré images is combined at the same time in the two-plus-two-point DPSAs, equations (11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A WFD of the order of 0.25λ in −1 is achieved if the phase increment φ G (x, y) is calculated with the three-point GPSA. On the other hand, the unwrapped phase-increment values provided directly by the two-plustwo-point DPSAs, φ D (x, y), equations (11), present an average value similar to φ G (x, y) for the same fringe profiles, but several discontinuities appear when the numerator and denominator of the inverse trigonometric function employed take small values (figure 5). This discrepancy points out the need for a detailed study of the sensitivity of the DPSA to the various sources of phase error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations