2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.629121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Uninformed and probabilistic distributed agent combinatorial searches for the unary NP-complete disassembly line balancing problem</title>

Abstract: Disassembly takes place in remanufacturing, recycling and disposal, with a line being the best choice for automation. The disassembly line balancing problem seeks a sequence which: is feasible, minimizes workstations, and ensures similar idle times, as well as other end-of-life specific concerns. Finding the optimal balance is computationally intensive due to exponential growth. Combinatorial optimization methods hold promise for providing solutions to the disassembly line balancing problem, which is proven he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In brief, the above comparisons demonstrate that the near optimal solutions generated by the proposed VNS approach surpasses the current best known solutions obtained via the single or multi objective approaches available in the literature. In other words, the solution quality of the VNS algorithm is much superior to that of, ACO (Kalayci and Gupta, 2013b;McGovern and Gupta, 2005b), multi objective ant colony optimization (MOACO) (Ding et al, 2010) , Hunter-Killer heuristic (McGovern andGupta, 2005b), RFD (Kalayci and Gupta, 2013a), TS (Kalayci and Gupta, 2013g), SA (Kalayci and Gupta, 2013e), PSO (Kalayci andGupta, 2012, 2013d), ABC (Kalayci and Gupta, 2013c;RL (Tuncel et al, 2012) algorithms. These comparison results confirm the competence of our proposed algorithm for solving the multi-objective DLBPs.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, the above comparisons demonstrate that the near optimal solutions generated by the proposed VNS approach surpasses the current best known solutions obtained via the single or multi objective approaches available in the literature. In other words, the solution quality of the VNS algorithm is much superior to that of, ACO (Kalayci and Gupta, 2013b;McGovern and Gupta, 2005b), multi objective ant colony optimization (MOACO) (Ding et al, 2010) , Hunter-Killer heuristic (McGovern andGupta, 2005b), RFD (Kalayci and Gupta, 2013a), TS (Kalayci and Gupta, 2013g), SA (Kalayci and Gupta, 2013e), PSO (Kalayci andGupta, 2012, 2013d), ABC (Kalayci and Gupta, 2013c;RL (Tuncel et al, 2012) algorithms. These comparison results confirm the competence of our proposed algorithm for solving the multi-objective DLBPs.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simple DALBP was proposed by Gungor and Gupta (2002) and has been also studied by McGovern and Gupta (2005, 2007). Heuristic and meta-heuristic algorithms were generally used in these problems.…”
Section: Disassembly Line Balancing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors considered several performance criteria in a lexicographic order: minimise the workstation idle times, maximise the priority of removing hazardous components and maximise the priority of removing high-demand components. Two multiobjective metaheuristics, a distributed agent ant system and an uninformed deterministic search, for the design and balancing of disassembly lines were developed and compared in McGovern and Gupta (2005). Other multi-objective formulations of the DLBP were presented in McGovern and Gupta (2006), Ding et al (2010) where the objectives are also ordered lexicographically.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%