2003
DOI: 10.2113/0530327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd isotope systems in zircon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
145
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 396 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
145
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the radioactive decay of 176 Lu to stable 176 Hf, fractionation during partial melting of the mantle leads to Hf-enriched partial melt and residual mantle depleted in Hf and enriched in Lu (Amelin et al 1999;Kinny and Maas 2003). Because zircon crystals easily incorporate Hf but not Lu, without additional 176 Lu to decay to 176 Hf, the ratio of 176 Hf to the stable isotope 177 Hf in the zircon essentially stays constant after formation of the zircon crystal.…”
Section: Detrital Zircon Hf Analysis: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the radioactive decay of 176 Lu to stable 176 Hf, fractionation during partial melting of the mantle leads to Hf-enriched partial melt and residual mantle depleted in Hf and enriched in Lu (Amelin et al 1999;Kinny and Maas 2003). Because zircon crystals easily incorporate Hf but not Lu, without additional 176 Lu to decay to 176 Hf, the ratio of 176 Hf to the stable isotope 177 Hf in the zircon essentially stays constant after formation of the zircon crystal.…”
Section: Detrital Zircon Hf Analysis: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because zircon crystals easily incorporate Hf but not Lu, without additional 176 Lu to decay to 176 Hf, the ratio of 176 Hf to the stable isotope 177 Hf in the zircon essentially stays constant after formation of the zircon crystal. In contrast, the enrichment of 176 Lu in the residual mantle due to fractionation during partial melting means that the mantle's 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratio increases with time as more 176 Lu decays to 176 Hf (e.g., Kinny and Maas 2003). The geochemical signature of the zircon crystal is described in terms of epsilon () units, where more positive Hf values indicate juvenile sources extracted from the mantle more recently and therefore record higher 176 Hf/ 177 Hf, and negative Hf values indicate evolved sources that were originally extracted from the mantle prior to significant fractionation, and therefore record lower 176 Hf/ 177 Hf.…”
Section: Detrital Zircon Hf Analysis: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, elevated Y/Nb values of the tuffaceous dacite (3.14-6.79) ( Table 2) also point to a crustal (Y/Nb N 2) origin (Eby, 1992). The in-situ Hf isotopic analysis of zircons, combined with their U-Pb ages, provides a robust method to trace the source and petrogenesis of magmas, and to constrain the crustal evolution history (Woodhead et al, 2001;Kinny and Maas, 2003;F.Y. Wu et al, 2006;Kemp et al, 2007;Santosh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Tugutublak Formation Tuffaceous Dacitic Lavamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al, 2006;Kemp et al, 2007;Santosh et al, 2015). Kinny and Maas (2003) have shown that negative ε Hf (t) values indicate source materials derived from partial melting of older crust and positive ε Hf (t) values indicate derivation from juvenile magmas. The zircon Hf isotope model ages represent the extraction time of source materials from the depleted mantle and the residence time in the crust .…”
Section: Tugutublak Formation Tuffaceous Dacitic Lavamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hf isotope composition of detrital zircon coupled with U-Pb dating represents a powerful tool to assess continental growth and recycling processes. Fractionation of Hf, which occurs between zircon and co-precipitating phases during magma generation (Vervoort et al 1999;Kinny and Maas 2003;Scherer et al 2007), preserves a record of the Hf isotope ratio of the magma and the crust where the magma originated, and allows Hf isotope composition to be utilized as a geochemical fingerprint of the magmatic source. In particular, times of juvenile material addition to the continental crust and crustal recycling can be recognized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%