2022
DOI: 10.1177/03063127221125438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luck and the ‘situations’ of research

Abstract: This research note uses material from interviews with senior scholars in the natural sciences to highlight, and start to explore, the role and nature of ‘luck’ in scientific careers. By examining this in the context of STS work on the nature of contemporary academia, we argue for the importance of taking luck seriously as we interrogate life and work in research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intertwined with prize winning and navigating the many “metrics challenges” of academic career development can be the growing perception that luck plays a critical role. A summary of interviews from those navigating academic careers repeatedly cited being lucky [45], while a similar summary of those navigating paths to become medical educators cited serendipity [46]. Similarly, there is growing data to suggest that the review processes used to rank grant applications are frequently underpowered, and winning can be assumed to be significantly influenced by chance or luck [39, 47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intertwined with prize winning and navigating the many “metrics challenges” of academic career development can be the growing perception that luck plays a critical role. A summary of interviews from those navigating academic careers repeatedly cited being lucky [45], while a similar summary of those navigating paths to become medical educators cited serendipity [46]. Similarly, there is growing data to suggest that the review processes used to rank grant applications are frequently underpowered, and winning can be assumed to be significantly influenced by chance or luck [39, 47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%