2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-3791(02)00021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luminescence chronology of loess-paleosol sequences from southern South Island, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the same reason mentioned above, this age must be considered a lower limit. However, if it is assumed that this loess formed during a glacial period, as is typical in the lower South Island (e.g., Berger et al 2001Berger et al , 2002, then sample WBE1 was probably deposited near the end of MIS 6 (186-128 ka), as it is unlikely that anomalous fading has resulted in an age underestimation of >300%, as would be the case if the sample was deposited during an older glaciation (i.e., during or before MIS 8). If this assumption is correct, then the overlying beach sand likely formed during the MISS 5e (128-113 ka) sea-level highstand.…”
Section: Marine Terrace Agesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same reason mentioned above, this age must be considered a lower limit. However, if it is assumed that this loess formed during a glacial period, as is typical in the lower South Island (e.g., Berger et al 2001Berger et al , 2002, then sample WBE1 was probably deposited near the end of MIS 6 (186-128 ka), as it is unlikely that anomalous fading has resulted in an age underestimation of >300%, as would be the case if the sample was deposited during an older glaciation (i.e., during or before MIS 8). If this assumption is correct, then the overlying beach sand likely formed during the MISS 5e (128-113 ka) sea-level highstand.…”
Section: Marine Terrace Agesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two subsamples were taken from the upper loess known as the Yellow Loess Member, which is approximately 2·5 m in depth. The third subsample was taken from the second major loess unit, the Brown A, at 2·66 m. Luminescence ages of c. 60 ka for the bottom of the Yellow Loess mean the bulk of loess was deposited during the Otira glaciation (MIS 2-4), while minimum ages for the Brown A loess of 184 ka suggest loess deposition took place during the Waimea glaciation (MIS 6) (Berger et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although generally sparse, organic material is present as wood within the gravel-dominated deposits, and also occurs as peat in terrace cover deposits, and charcoal within tephras. Luminescence dating is being increasingly used in New Zealand to extend age control beyond the limits of radiocarbon dating, and has particularly been used to date loess (e.g., Berger et al, 1992Berger et al, , 2001Berger et al, , 2002Litchfield and Lian, 2004). The present study is the first to apply Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) dating directly to fluvial deposits in the eastern North Island, although OSL ages of loess coverbeds have been used to estimate the minimum ages of river terrace deposits (Wang, 2001;Formento-Trigilio et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%