Luminescence of ZnO crystals under surface and bulk excitation regimes

Abstract

Luminescence properties of vapor phase grown ZnO single crystals with different content of deep traps were explored under one‐photon and two‐photon excitation. Room‐temperature near bandgap emission of highly excited ZnO crystals was originated by inelastic exciton scattering. Under surface excitation regime, luminescence decay profile was governed by exciton diffusion and bimolecular recombination. At higher excitation, exciton recombination transients were significantly altered by stimulated emission. Two‐photon bulk‐like excitation revealed exciton recombination dynamics related to defect states. Correlation between the luminescence decay rate and the density of deep trap states of variously annealed crystals was observed. Results on crystal optical quality were in line with estimated values of stimulated emission threshold. The largest value of the average luminescence decay time τlu = 1.5 ns and the lowest value of the stimulated emission threshold Iexc = 0.6 mJ/cm2 were obtained for ZnO crystal annealed in vacuum. (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Inactivation of bacterial biofilms using visible-light-activated unmodified ZnO nanorods

“…Band-edge fluorescence of ZnO NRs after 266 nm excitation peaked at about 380 nm (see figure 2(b)), similar to other reported values for ACG-grown ZnO nanorods [27,35], epilayers [36] or bulk crystals [37]. Since the excitation power density was moderately high, the origin of the near-band-edge emission is believed to be inelastic exciton-exciton scattering [37]. One photon excitation creates the high density of excitons in a shallow region of the ZnO NR surface, roughly about…”

Characteristics of point defects in the green luminescence from Zn- and O-rich ZnO

“…35 From time-resolved PL measurements, b = 10 −10 cm 3 s −1 has been determined for ZnO excitonic recombination. 36 Under the excitation conditions described in Sec. III A., the cores of the highly crystalline particles dictate the CL emission, thus the coefficient value for bulk ZnO was used instead of those for ZnO nanostructures.…”

“…Taking into consideration that the radiative lifetime of excitons in ZnO is about 1 ns at 80 K, 36,38 while the characteristic recombination time of GL varies in the range from 0.2 to 10 ns, 11,31,37 we used τ a = 1 ns and τ b = τ c = 5 ns to keep the problem tractable. In CL measurements, it is more useful to work with the e-h pair generation rate in the electron interaction volume, which, to a first approximation, equals the product of the (average) generation rate G and electron interaction volume.…”