2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2015.07.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luminex crossmatch for pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although DSAXM Class II false results have occasionally been reported [30][31][32][33] , in our study, the DSAXM results for HLA class II correlated well with FCXM results. Although our sample size was small, DSAXM was preferred to the CDCXM procedure, thereby eliminating the reliance on viable cells because DSAXM uses donor lysate, which can also be stored for future analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although DSAXM Class II false results have occasionally been reported [30][31][32][33] , in our study, the DSAXM results for HLA class II correlated well with FCXM results. Although our sample size was small, DSAXM was preferred to the CDCXM procedure, thereby eliminating the reliance on viable cells because DSAXM uses donor lysate, which can also be stored for future analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…There have been reports by others of false-positive DSAXM Class II results [30][31][32][33] . However, the DSAXM Class II results recorded in the current study correlated well with FCXM, as well as with the Luminex DSA method.…”
Section: Limitation Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of DSA is useful because of its clarity of interpretation and low false positivity in post-transplant recipients. The authors however reported a high rate of false positive results in pretransplant work up [12]. False positive DSA results were confirmed on the basis of a negative PRA screen in eight recipients which was further confirmed in four of them because they were HLA identical with respect to donor for HLA DR. AMR including a combined picture with ACR, was histologically identified in 37/105 (35.2%) of biopsies of which 27 were positive for DSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%