2013
DOI: 10.1021/ie403272f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lumping and Reduction of Detailed Kinetic Schemes: an Effective Coupling

Abstract: When it comes to handling large hydrocarbon molecules and describing the pyrolysis and combustion behavior of complex mixtures, the potential and limitations of detailed chemistry require a careful investigation. Indeed, as they involve a large number of species and reactions, detailed kinetic mechanisms often make the model predictions computationally expensive, thus strongly restricting their potential. Therefore, the automatic generation of detailed mechanisms with several thousands of molecular species and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of inert species is forced in the mechanism, even if their fluxes are null. Previous experiences on the reduction of n-dodecane oxidation mechanism [62] clearly showed that the skeletal mechanism obtained by reducing a lumped mechanism involved about 120 species, whereas about 300 species were required by the reduced mechanism derived from a detailed scheme [42]. This fact is further confirmed by the recent work of Narayanaswamy et al [63], who reduced the detailed kinetics of n-dodecane to 295 species.…”
Section: Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of inert species is forced in the mechanism, even if their fluxes are null. Previous experiences on the reduction of n-dodecane oxidation mechanism [62] clearly showed that the skeletal mechanism obtained by reducing a lumped mechanism involved about 120 species, whereas about 300 species were required by the reduced mechanism derived from a detailed scheme [42]. This fact is further confirmed by the recent work of Narayanaswamy et al [63], who reduced the detailed kinetics of n-dodecane to 295 species.…”
Section: Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…With the same accuracy, the skeletal model derived from a lumped scheme contains about one third of the species required by the skeletal model derived from the detailed mechanism, as already shown in Fig. and further discussed by Stagni et al …”
Section: Complexity Of the Kinetic Mechanisms: Lumping Procedures Andmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…One method is to use fully detailed models as a base to derive semi-detailed lumped models [56] in which the isomers of large molecules are grouped together (for example, simplifying the three heptene 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 isomers into a general heptene species). These semi-detailed models can then be reduced appropriately [101]. Table 4 provides a survey of reduced n-dodecane and n-heptane models from the literature (as well as the 131-species NUI model from Table 2).…”
Section: Predictions From Reduced Detailed and Lumped Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study the oxidation of ethylene is modelled using the C1-C3 sub-mechanism from the July 2014 version of the detailed POLIMI mechanism for hydrocarbon combustion. 33 The full 106 species sub-mechanism was used for the zero-and one-dimensional calculations, whereas a 31 species reduced mechanism was generated using a combined chemical reduction approach, based on reacting flux analysis, 34 for the two-dimensional non-premixed simulations to minimise the required computational time. The cases investigated were chosen for qualitative comparison with previously published experimental 19 and turbulent DNS 29 studies of ethylene fuelled flames.Both studies feature ethylene based jets at Re = 10 000 issuing into hot, laminar coflows with bulk flow velocities approximately 10% of the mean jet exit velocity.…”
Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%