2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lumping and splitting: Developmental changes in the structure of children’s semantic networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these results suggest parallel developmental changes in both visual production and recognition of drawings across childhood. Children may undergo a more protracted developmental trajectory for the development of visual concepts than previously DEVELOPMENT OF VISUAL PRODUCTION AND RECOGNITION thought, in tandem with refinements in their perceptual abilities (Bova et al, 2007;Natu et al, 2016) and their semantic knowledge about object categories (Tversky, 1985;Vales, Stevens, & Fisher, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together, these results suggest parallel developmental changes in both visual production and recognition of drawings across childhood. Children may undergo a more protracted developmental trajectory for the development of visual concepts than previously DEVELOPMENT OF VISUAL PRODUCTION AND RECOGNITION thought, in tandem with refinements in their perceptual abilities (Bova et al, 2007;Natu et al, 2016) and their semantic knowledge about object categories (Tversky, 1985;Vales, Stevens, & Fisher, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in early childhood, the fastest cheetah -that is, the exemplar with the most extreme value on some property -tends to be seen as the best and the most representative cheetah (Foster-Hanson & Rhodes, 2019). At the same time, taxonomic groupings become increasingly important both in children's explicit conceptual judgements (Tversky, 1985) and when children spontaneously arrange different visual concepts (e.g., wild vs. farm animals, Vales et al, 2020). Thus, children's evolving semantic knowledge could shape the visual features children use both when producing and recognizing different visual concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a crucial difference relative to prior work (Fisher et al, 2015), and in requiring children to simultaneously attend to both distinctions might have reduced the odds that children noticed within domain distinctions. Prior work using this task suggests that these are important methodological considerations (Vales et al, 2020b), and we believe future work intending to use remote assessments of semantic structure and semantic inferences should consider the goals of the assessments when deciding whether to examine within-and across-domain differentiation in the same or separate trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, however, results in a considerable difference relative to the procedure employed by Fisher et al (2015), who tested triads of items in each trial -thus providing children with a much smaller number of items at a time and thus more degrees of freedom to arrange them. In the case of the spatial arrangement task as designed for this study, the need to attend to both withinand across-domain differentiation, as well as the larger number of cards presented at once, likely reduced the likelihood of detecting individual differences in within-domain differentiation [see Experiment 2 in Vales et al (2020b) for converging evidence]. Taken together, these results suggest that future work examining semantic structure -and in particular, individual differences in within-domain differentiation in young children -may want to consider whether to assess within-domain differentiation in separate trials and how many items to present in each trial.…”
Section: Relation Between Degree Of Within-domain Differentiation and Inferences In The Presence Of Close Luresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the course of development, semantic organization both expands to incorporate new concepts and new relations between concepts (Bjorklund & Jacobs, 1985;Blaye, Bernard-Peyron, Paour, & Bonthoux, 2006;Coley, 2012;Crowe & Prescott, 2003;Howard & Howard, 1977;Nguyen, 2007;Storm, 1980;Tversky, 1985;Unger, Fisher, Nugent, Ventura, & MacLellan, 2016;Vales, Stevens, & Fisher, 2020;Walsh, Richardson, & Faulkner, 1993). The trajectory of semantic organization development has been extensively studied in prior developmental research.…”
Section: Accounting For the Trajectory Of Semantic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%