2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019je006313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lunar Secondary Craters and Estimated Ejecta Block Sizes Reveal a Scale‐Dependent Fragmentation Trend

Abstract: Planetary impact events eject large volumes of surface material. Crater excavation processes are difficult to study, and in particular the details of individual ejecta fragments are not well understood. A related, enduring issue in planetary mapping is whether a given crater resulted from a primary impact (asteroid or comet) or instead is a secondary crater created by an ejecta fragment. With mapping and statistical analyses of six lunar secondary crater fields (including Orientale, Copernicus, and Kepler) we … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(160 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent simulations of impact fragmentation suggest that ejecta capable of reaching the antipode produced by a 100-km-diameter impactor will consist of 50–1000 m scale fragments 24 . These estimates are consistent with extrapolation from observations of secondary craters of Orientale 25 . Even ejecta fragments as small as 0.5 m have a cooling timescale, = 70 h, which is longer than the flight time of most antipodal ejecta (>93%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recent simulations of impact fragmentation suggest that ejecta capable of reaching the antipode produced by a 100-km-diameter impactor will consist of 50–1000 m scale fragments 24 . These estimates are consistent with extrapolation from observations of secondary craters of Orientale 25 . Even ejecta fragments as small as 0.5 m have a cooling timescale, = 70 h, which is longer than the flight time of most antipodal ejecta (>93%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Secondary craters have been shown to be a key component of crater populations on various surfaces, ranging from the Moon (Dundas & McEwen 2007) to Mars (McEwen et al 2005) to icy moons such as Europa and Ganymede (Bierhaus et al 2005;Zahnle et al 2008;Singer et al 2013). The study of such craters is not only important for accurately dating these surfaces (Bierhaus et al 2018), but also for determining the ejecta size distributions from primary impacts (Singer et al 2013(Singer et al , 2020, thus verifying the validity of the cratering models (Melosh 1984) and scaling laws (Housen & Holsapple 2011) at planetary scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The reddening of the spectrum after the impact suggests that finer particles may be present compared to before the impact (e.g., Johnson & Fanale 1973;Vernazza et al 2016). Fine particles ejected from craters by the excavation flow can have a wide range of ejection velocities (Singer et al 2020). However, finer particles have faster ejection velocities on average than larger particles, meaning that large particles should have preferentially been re-accreted at the surface of 596 after the impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%