2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lunar soils, simulants and lunar construction materials: An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this work uses just one example of a lunar regolith simulant, several others have been developed that represent the chemical and physical properties of regolith, to varying degrees of accuracy (Toklu and Akpinar, 2022). The assumptions in the model used here, evidently, do not lead to a perfect representation of LMS-1 behaviour.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this work uses just one example of a lunar regolith simulant, several others have been developed that represent the chemical and physical properties of regolith, to varying degrees of accuracy (Toklu and Akpinar, 2022). The assumptions in the model used here, evidently, do not lead to a perfect representation of LMS-1 behaviour.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the radiation intensity increases from 1173.24 keV to 1332.50 keV, the growth rate of the radiation attenuation coefficient with increasing material density increases to 0.08 [24]. The density of the lunar regolith samples ranges from 1.2 to 3.2 g/cm 3 . The formation of geopolymers in the lunar regolith after alkali activation results in higher densities [2,88].…”
Section: Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of geopolymers in the lunar regolith after alkali activation results in higher densities [2,88]. The density of the lunar regolith samples ranges from 1.2 to 3.2 g/cm 3 . The formation of geopolymers in the lunar regolith after alkali activation results in higher densities [2,88].…”
Section: Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations