2004
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00113603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung cancer: clinical presentation and specialist referral time

Abstract: Many textbooks describe symptoms and signs of lung cancer but refer to old series of patients.To update knowledge about lung cancer presentation, a study was carried out on 1,277 consecutive lung cancer patients, who were seen in a single Institution from January 1989 to October 2002. A set of 33 anthropometric, clinical, physical, laboratory, radiological, pathological and follow-up variables was prospectively recorded for all patients. In addition, information was obtained concerning symptoms of alarm (i.e. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
84
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Myrdal and colleagues 3 included patients across all pathological stages, the majority of whom were stage III or IV. In a study by Buccheri and colleagues, 4 delays in time between the presentation of first symptoms and consultation with a specialist were examined in 1277 patients with stage I-IV NSCLC. They found a small but statistically significant decrease in survival in patients with delays greater than 2 months compared with those who waited less than 2 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myrdal and colleagues 3 included patients across all pathological stages, the majority of whom were stage III or IV. In a study by Buccheri and colleagues, 4 delays in time between the presentation of first symptoms and consultation with a specialist were examined in 1277 patients with stage I-IV NSCLC. They found a small but statistically significant decrease in survival in patients with delays greater than 2 months compared with those who waited less than 2 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherence to the foregoing recommendations has been shown to be relatively poor in multiple countries [6][7][8][9] . However, the effect of timely investigation and treatment for lung cancer on progression-free survival (pfs), relapse-free survival (rfs) after primary surgical resection, and overall survival (os) is unclear 10,11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,4,[16][17][18][19][20][21] In our study, only 5.9% of the patients were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, although there was an incidental diagnosis in 14.8% of cases, since although having symptoms associated with the tumour, these were not the reason for consulting. There is a wide variation between the different populations in the proportion of those diagnosed incidentally.…”
Section: 15mentioning
confidence: 87%