2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004200000221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung cancer due to passive smoking - a review

Abstract: The average intake of toxic and genotoxic compounds due to ETS exposure is that low that it is difficult, if not impossible, to explain the increased risk of lung cancer as found in epidemiological studies. The uncertainty is further increased because the validity of epidemiological studies on passive smoking is limited severely by numerous bias and confounding factors which cannot be controlled for reliability. The question of whether or not ETS exposure is high enough to induce and/or promote the carcinogeni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1992, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimated that ETS is responsible for 3000 lung cancer deaths annually [2]. Since the US EPA report, three population-based studies [3][4][5][6] and several meta-analyses have provided further evidence for a direct association between ETS and lung cancer among never smokers [7][8][9][10][11]. However, evidence for a causal association between ETS and lung cancer has been inconsistently reported across studies [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1992, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimated that ETS is responsible for 3000 lung cancer deaths annually [2]. Since the US EPA report, three population-based studies [3][4][5][6] and several meta-analyses have provided further evidence for a direct association between ETS and lung cancer among never smokers [7][8][9][10][11]. However, evidence for a causal association between ETS and lung cancer has been inconsistently reported across studies [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ETS is qualitatively similar in composition to mainstream smoke and contains the same carcinogens, toxic compounds and oxidizers, albeit at lower concentrations than those inhaled by smokers [1]. Exposure to ETS has been causally linked to lung cancer [1, 36] and has some association with asthma in never-smoking adults [1, 5]. In children, ETS exposure has been linked to lower respiratory tract infections, asthma induction and exacerbation, and chronic respiratory symptoms such as wheezing and coughing [1, 5, 7, 8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of secondary, second hand, or passive smoking will come out surely under these circumstances, and several sources have detailed the issue [18, 19]. In an obvious desperate attempt to control smoking in public environments, Albanian government passed an ad hoc bill, on November 2006, which forecasted severe fines applied to smokers; such fines in fact were never collected [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%