1993
DOI: 10.1016/0954-6111(93)90074-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung deposition from four nebulizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this publication, we will refer to this device as Akita 2 . The Akita 2 deposits ,70% of the loaded dose in the lung [26], compared with 10-20% for conventional jet nebuliser systems [27][28][29][30]. Therefore, total lung dose of dornase alfa during this study was estimated to be 3-5 times higher than with standard jet nebulisers.…”
Section: Study Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this publication, we will refer to this device as Akita 2 . The Akita 2 deposits ,70% of the loaded dose in the lung [26], compared with 10-20% for conventional jet nebuliser systems [27][28][29][30]. Therefore, total lung dose of dornase alfa during this study was estimated to be 3-5 times higher than with standard jet nebulisers.…”
Section: Study Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Delivery was only during inspiration, and an optimized surfactant concentration allowed the inhalation of the maximum amounts. However, intrapulmonary delivery was not directly assessed with a radiotracer, because this particular inhalation device has already been shown to result in about 19% intrapulmonary delivery in normal persons [28]. In adults with CF, a similar total pulmonary deposition is expected, the distribution, however, being uneven with a decreased aerosol entry to poorly ventilated regions [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In some cases, residual loss can account for nearly 50 -75% of the drug placed in the nebulizer. 21,22 Moreover, there are differences in drug delivery related to nebulizer flow and gas composition and whether the device is being powered by a compressor or pressurized gas source.…”
Section: Aerosol Device Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%