2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.815732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung Ultrasound as a First-Line Test in the Evaluation of Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Sequelae

Abstract: Background: Interstitial lung sequelae are increasingly being reported in survivors of COVID-19 pneumonia. An early detection of these lesions may help prevent the development of irreversible lung fibrosis. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has shown high diagnostic accuracy in interstitial lung disease (ILD) and could likely be used as a first-line test for post-COVID-19 lung sequelae.Methods: Single-center observational prospective study. Follow-up assessments of consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study observed a significant association between LUS score and the presence of fibrotic-like changes on chest HRCT after a follow-up of 6 months from the acute disease. Our results are consistent with two previous studies, in which patients were evaluated 3 [ 24 ] and 2–5 [ 26 ] months after COVID-19 hospitalization. In particular, the study by Clofent et al reported a strong correlation between LUS and CT scores in a patient cohort characterized by a wide range of clinical severity in the acute phase, including a relevant amount of patients who did not require oxygen supplementation [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study observed a significant association between LUS score and the presence of fibrotic-like changes on chest HRCT after a follow-up of 6 months from the acute disease. Our results are consistent with two previous studies, in which patients were evaluated 3 [ 24 ] and 2–5 [ 26 ] months after COVID-19 hospitalization. In particular, the study by Clofent et al reported a strong correlation between LUS and CT scores in a patient cohort characterized by a wide range of clinical severity in the acute phase, including a relevant amount of patients who did not require oxygen supplementation [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results are consistent with two previous studies, in which patients were evaluated 3 [ 24 ] and 2–5 [ 26 ] months after COVID-19 hospitalization. In particular, the study by Clofent et al reported a strong correlation between LUS and CT scores in a patient cohort characterized by a wide range of clinical severity in the acute phase, including a relevant amount of patients who did not require oxygen supplementation [ 26 ]. In contrast with our study, a high variability in the timing of follow-up evaluation (median 90 days, IQR, 64–114) was described.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of LUS for the follow-up and early detection of interstitial lung disease post COVID-19 seems of interest. Albeit small and monocentric datasets, characterization of the sonographic interstitial syndrome seems to correlate well with CT findings such as ground glass opacities or parenchymal bands (Clofent et al 2021). Where chest X-ray offers a static impression of TB sequelae, lung ultrasound might be a complementary dynamic exam to help identify patients at risk for post-TB fibrosis, pachypleuritis and superinfections.…”
Section: Follow-up Of Tb Sequelaementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Though CXR is recommended as a routine test to evaluate post-COVID-19 patients at the long COVID-19 outpatient clinic [ 10 ], it is less sensitive than high-resolution CT of chest in detecting pulmonary abnormalities in acute COVID-19 patients [ 11 ]. Recent evidence has suggested the utility of lung ultrasound to assess for interstitial pulmonary complications in post-COVID-19 patients [ 12 ]. Our patient presented with prominent diffuse ground glass opacities and emphysema which could be difficult to detect on CXR and would require characterization with a high-resolution CT of the chest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%