1993
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4825(93)90099-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analysis: Estimating the Poisson parameter in a compound Poisson distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating the two parameters of a classical Luria-Delbrück distribution by the method of maximum likelihood was proposed long ago [8], [12], [31], [32]. Using well known explicit formulas, the method has been implemented [11], [14], [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimating the two parameters of a classical Luria-Delbrück distribution by the method of maximum likelihood was proposed long ago [8], [12], [31], [32]. Using well known explicit formulas, the method has been implemented [11], [14], [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical methods : the estimate of the expected number of mutations was computed by two different methods: the -method [1], [5], [28], and the maximum likelihood (ML) method [12], [31], [32], both applied to the sample of mutant counts. Dividing by the expected final number , assumed to be known, leads to two estimates for .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely used estimators of mutation rates are: the P 0 estimator (Luria and Delbrück 1943), the median estimator (Lea and Coulson 1949), the Lea-Coulson estimator (1949), and the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE; Jones et al 1993;Zheng 2002) as well as Bayesian estimators (Asteris and Sarkar 2002), as reviewed by Foster (2006). However, most of these estimators, such as P 0 , mean and median, do not (and cannot) consider variations in population sizes of the parallel cultures, but assume the same population size for each parallel culture.…”
Section: Modified Median Estimator Of Mutation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first explicit and practical algorithm for computing the MLE of m was published by Jones et al (1993). To evaluate the reliability of the MLE, Stewart then provided a systematic method for constructing CIs (Stewart 1994).…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various mutation rate estimators have been developed based on the LD distribution, including the P 0 estimator (Luria and Delbrück, 1943), the mean estimator (Luria and Delbrück, 1943), the median estimator (Lea and Coulson, 1949;Drake, 1991;Jones et al, 1994) and the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) Jones et al, 1993). Extensive simulations have shown that the MLE outperforms the other estimators in terms of bias and variance (Stewart, 1994;Rosche and Foster, 2000) since it incorporates all information from the mutant-count distribution (rather than just moments or quantiles).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%