1982
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0950417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luteinizing hormone levels in aged female laboratory rodents as measured by a radioimmunoassay and a radioreceptor assay

Abstract: Plasma levels of LH were measured in young sexually mature (2- to 5-month-old) and aged (13- to 20-month-old) female C57BL/6 mice, Syrian hamsters and Wistar rats using a radioimmunoassay (RIA) and a radioreceptor assay (RRA). There were no statistically significant differences when comparing data from the two assays when examining young oestrous and dioestrous mice. Aged oestrous and dioestrous mice exhibited significantly higher levels of LH as measured by RIA than by RRA. Levels of LH analysed by RIA were a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the obvious difficulty to compare results obtained by means of in vivo and in vitro approaches, and the difference in the stimulus used to elicit the hormonal response (i.e. oCRH and HE), it might be possible that immunoreactive ACTH se creted from the pituitary of aged rats has less biological activity than that secreted by the pituitary of young rats, as has been reported for luteinizing hormone [26] or for thyrotropic hor mone [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the obvious difficulty to compare results obtained by means of in vivo and in vitro approaches, and the difference in the stimulus used to elicit the hormonal response (i.e. oCRH and HE), it might be possible that immunoreactive ACTH se creted from the pituitary of aged rats has less biological activity than that secreted by the pituitary of young rats, as has been reported for luteinizing hormone [26] or for thyrotropic hor mone [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%