2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2016.7841971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LWIR: LTE-WLAN Integration at RLC Layer with Virtual WLAN Scheduler for Efficient Aggregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach considers delay, power and Quality of Experience (QoE) as primary parameters to split the traffic. The work in [22] reduces the waiting time of queues by introducing a virtual WLAN scheduler and aggregating at RLC layer, however, it is not applicable for non-collocated scenarios as it demands heavy MAC layer interactions. Connecting to a BS and AP is considered as a joint optimization problem in [23] and it is solved to minimize cost and power.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach considers delay, power and Quality of Experience (QoE) as primary parameters to split the traffic. The work in [22] reduces the waiting time of queues by introducing a virtual WLAN scheduler and aggregating at RLC layer, however, it is not applicable for non-collocated scenarios as it demands heavy MAC layer interactions. Connecting to a BS and AP is considered as a joint optimization problem in [23] and it is solved to minimize cost and power.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and are the power consumed in LTE and WiFi network respectively. The throughput of UE is derived from Shannon-Hartley theorem as in [22] which dependent on factors like network load, interference affecting signal strength etc. It gains best throughput independent of network load when it is always aggregated, as it receives dataflow from both LTE and WiFi network which turns out to be the best case.…”
Section: Analysis Of Throughput Maximizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the delay difference, the study assumed that it is possible to redesign the radio link control (RLC) and the radio resource management (RRM) layer of the LWA. Sharma et al [12] proposed a queue management scheme to reduce the out-of-delivery transmissions, while Lin et al [13] designed a delay-sensitive switching structure between LTE and WiFi. Balan et al [14] proposed an adaptive management scheme for WiFi and LTE resources depending on the radio conditions, such as the radio signal strength index (RSSI) for the WiFi and signal-to-interference noise ratio (SINR) for LTE around the users who stayed in both regions.…”
Section: Rerated Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the approaches in [8] and [11] require the estimation of available licensed bandwidth and the exact load over the WiFi network, both of which could not be perfect if the rapidly changing radio environment and users' behaviors are considered. Other prior works [12]- [14], also assumed the existence of inter-cell interfaces (e.g., Xw interface: 3GPP TS36.465, E-UTRAN, and WLAN-Xw interface user plane protocol) for information exchange necessary for running their algorithms. Unfortunately, frequent measurements from the WiFi networks and information exchange via a separate interface are unrealistic.…”
Section: Rerated Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], authors have studied the performance of TCP in LWA using a real time testbed and observed that PDCP reordering timer has an adverse impact on TCP. A new architecture, coined as LWIR [7], for efficient LTE and WLAN aggregation at the RLC layer of LTE eNodeB has been proposed. In LWIR architecture, the packet from cellular core network is steered at RLC into LTE or Wi-Fi MAC queues.…”
Section: Architecture Proposal and Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%