2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2012.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lyapunov-based nonlinear controllers for obstacle avoidance with a planar -link doubly nonholonomic manipulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Lyapunov-based control scheme utilized in this paper has been introduced in numerous applications for various robotic systems including ones tagged with holonomic or nonholonomic constraints [3,22]. It is relatively easier to construct mathematical functions from limitations, inequalities, restrictions, and mechanical constraints tagged to the robotic systems and incorporate them in the controllers derived from LbCS, compared to the other motion and control schemes from literature [3,23,24].…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lyapunov-based control scheme utilized in this paper has been introduced in numerous applications for various robotic systems including ones tagged with holonomic or nonholonomic constraints [3,22]. It is relatively easier to construct mathematical functions from limitations, inequalities, restrictions, and mechanical constraints tagged to the robotic systems and incorporate them in the controllers derived from LbCS, compared to the other motion and control schemes from literature [3,23,24].…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The scheme has been recently applied to motion planning and control of various robotic systems, including ones tagged with holonomic or nonholonomic constraints. 4,26,28 The seminal idea behind this control scheme is to design the attractive and repulsive potential functions which are summed to form a suitable Lyapunov function that acts as an artificial potential field function or total potentials. From this, the nonlinear controllers, centralized or decentralized, velocity or accelerationbased, are extracted.…”
Section: Background On Collision Avoidance Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is mainly because of this reason that only a small number of researchers consider type (nh, nh) manipulators for complex tasks. 11,12,14,28 While the control strategies of mobile manipulators can either be centralized such as in 9,10 or decentralized such as in, [11][12][13] to the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no decentralized acceleration control laws that solve the motion planning and posture control problem of multiple type (nh, nh) manipulators.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the concept and methods using potential fields are quite well‐established, an array of novel advantages of this new control scheme is a testimony of its wide application in the field of robotics. The control scheme has been introduced in numerous applications for various robotic systems, including ones tagged with holonomic or nonholonomic constraints . It is relatively easier to construct mathematical functions from limitations, inequalities, restrictions, and mechanical constraints tagged to the mechanical systems and subsequently incorporate these into the controllers derived from LbCS, as compared with the other motion and control schemes from the literature .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LbCS controllers are also elegant and very simple to construct compared to the others in the literature, which are mathematically and computationally intensive, and hence, they avoid complex situations and multiple systems . The scheme has been deployed effectively in complex environments and has also been introduced to biologically inspired concept from the nature …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%