This paper gives a critical overview of Jörg Meibauer's (2014) monograph entitled Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface and addresses a selection of theoretical issues pertinent to lying and deception. Thus, following a brief summary of the volume's contents, more attention is paid to the speaker's intention to deceive as a potentially necessary condition for lying, which invites a question concerning the status of bald-faced lies. Further, this article focuses on deception performed by dint of implicature. Meibauer's (2014) postulates in reference to these issues are critically revisited, and the focal phenomena are examined from a broader perspective.Keywords: bald-faced lie, deception, figure of speech, first maxim of Quality, Grice, implicature, lie, what is said
General overviewIn his recent monograph, wittily entitled Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, Jörg Meibauer (2014) brings together diversified academic traditions to tease out the mechanics of lying. He collates insights from the philosophy of language, semantics, and pragmatics (focusing on Speech Act Theory, as well as neo-Gricean and post-Gricean frameworks) in order to give a broad but, at the same time, detailed description of lying. The panoply of theories and proposals that feed into Meibauer's (2014) account and the number of references he makes in the course of the volume testify to his broad linguistic knowledge of the scholarship on not only lying and deception but also notions and approaches not immediately related to this topic. By transposing those concepts and conceptualizations onto lying, the author develops an internally heterogeneous analysis of the focal phenomenon. The succinct summary below cannot possibly do justice to the plethora of the postulates put forward in the monograph.