Lymph node ratio predicts overall survival in patients with stage II non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based SEER analysis

Abstract

Background In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there are many factors that affect prognosis, and the lymph node ratio (LNR) may play a significant role. Our study aimed to confirm the value of the LNR in the prognosis of patients with stage II NSCLC. Methods Patient data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The classification for the LNR was best determined using the X-tile method. The correlation between the LNR and overall survival (OS) was validated after the Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed. To determine the correlation between the LNR and survival, stratification and the Cox regression analysis were used. Results In our study, 14,183 stage II NSCLC patients were included. Among them, 8303 patients had N1 disease. According to the X-tile analysis, the optimal critical points for the LNR in N1 patients with NSCLC was 0.21 and 0.38. We categorized the cohorts as low (LNR-L ≤ 0.21; n = 5158, 62.1%), medium (0.21 < LNR-M ≤ 0.38; n = 1736, 20.9%), and high (LNR-H > 0.38; n = 1409, 17.0%). According to the Kaplan–Meier analysis, the patients with a high LNR were considerably worse than those with a medium or low LNR (P < 0.001), which was also proven by stratified and multivariate analyses. The value of the LNR was reflected in all the subgroup analyses, especially in patients ages < 60 years. The multivariate competing risks regression analysis revealed that younger age, female sex, T1 disease, adenocarcinoma and N0 disease was associated with a better prognosis after controlling for potential confounders (P < 0.001). Conclusions For patients with stage II NSCLC, the LNR is valuable for assessing prognosis. A higher LNR indicates a worse prognosis.

Lymph Node Ratio Enhances Predictive Value for Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

“…[5,12] The LNR, considering both the number of positive lymph nodes and the number of examined lymph nodes, had emerged as a valuable prognostic factor in NSCLC. [23][24][25] Our study reaffirmed the LNR's significance as an independent prognostic factor for both CSS and OS. Moreover, the LNR categories (LNR1 [LNR < 0.19], LNR2 [0.19 ≤ LNR ≤ 0.73], and LNR3 [LNR > 0.73]) demonstrated superior discriminatory and predictive abilities for prognosis compared to pN stages.…”