1945
DOI: 10.1097/00000441-194507000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lymph Nodes in Leishmaniasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous reports by Schultz and Swift (6), by Angevine (7), and by Freund and Opie (21) we were unable to find any relationship between skin reactions and titre of circulating antibodies. Likewise, there was no definite correlation between cutaneous reactions and antibody titre of extracts from internal organs.…”
Section: R]~sume and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In agreement with previous reports by Schultz and Swift (6), by Angevine (7), and by Freund and Opie (21) we were unable to find any relationship between skin reactions and titre of circulating antibodies. Likewise, there was no definite correlation between cutaneous reactions and antibody titre of extracts from internal organs.…”
Section: R]~sume and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the New World, lymphadenopathy may accompany or even precede skin lesion due to the Leishmania braziliensis complex, indicating that spread from the skin to lymph nodes occurs early in the course of infection [3][4][5]. However, localized lymphadenopathy without cutaneous or systemic manifestations is unusual and has been rarely reported [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Most cases were diagnosed by surgical biopsy because of a suspected lymphoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periosteum. The essential lathyric lesions are hyperplasia of periosteal cells, elevation of periosteum, and osteogenesis mainly in membrane but occasionally in cartilage . Angevine (1959) reported absence of ossification, but it has not been possible to confmn this observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%