DOI: 10.1159/000386039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lymphocyte Proliferation and Lymphoproliferative Disorders1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found no definite evidence that in tbe CLL patients studied by us there was a consistent difference between lymphocyte responses to PHA after 3 and 6 days of culture, although it has been reported (Reviewed by Rubin et al., 1970) that the response at 5-7 days is greater than that at 2-3 days. A greater 6-day response could have been due to the forttiitous choice of a single PHA eoneenti^ation, but, when the complete dose response curves were compared, the differences were hardly striking.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We found no definite evidence that in tbe CLL patients studied by us there was a consistent difference between lymphocyte responses to PHA after 3 and 6 days of culture, although it has been reported (Reviewed by Rubin et al., 1970) that the response at 5-7 days is greater than that at 2-3 days. A greater 6-day response could have been due to the forttiitous choice of a single PHA eoneenti^ation, but, when the complete dose response curves were compared, the differences were hardly striking.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, Tormey and Mueller (1965), Yamamoto (1966) and Kay (1967) all found that expo.sure to PHA for long periods-up to 24 h at least-was necessary in order to produce a maximal response, as measured by H'''-thymidine uptake at 72 h, while Lindahl- Kiessling and Peterson (1969) reported good lymphocyte stimulation in cells exposed to high coneentrations for as little as 30 min. The concept of rapid PHA binding by lymphocytes has been advanced but not documented in recent reviews (Rubin et al., 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The la belling intensity of newly synthesized RNA, however, depends on the concentration of 3H-cytidine in the soluble pool. This pool exchanges only slowly with the extracellular fluid [8,11], so that 2 h after the end of 3H-cytidine exposure of the lymphocytes their soluble pool retains about 4/5 of its original maximal activity [14]. Therefore it can be expected that the lymphocytes labelled in vitro reach their maximal RNA labelling not dur ing the 1 or 3 h of incubation but only some hours later, i.e.…”
Section: Changes Of the Labelling Intensity Of The In Vitro Labelled mentioning
confidence: 99%