1965
DOI: 10.1177/028418516500300204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lymphography, Cavography and Urography in the Evaluation of Malignant Lymphomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These fig ures are similar to those reported by Lee et al [15], Schwarz et al [20], Tsyb and Kislitsyn [23] and Pent ala and Torsti [17], while they are slightly higher than those found by Pi liar i [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These fig ures are similar to those reported by Lee et al [15], Schwarz et al [20], Tsyb and Kislitsyn [23] and Pent ala and Torsti [17], while they are slightly higher than those found by Pi liar i [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…More than one sign is usually present in the same pa tient. A definite superiority of lymphogra phy over cavography in revealing occult dis ease in inguinal, iliac and lumbar lymph nodes is reported in the literature [17,20,22], while cavography proved more effec tive in detecting enlarged lymph nodes in the upper areas as it outlines soft tissue ab normalities above the para-aortic nodes, but still below the diaphragm, not visualized by lymphography. Urography as a single method of examination has only minor utiliIn our patients we found a fairly good agreement between cavographie and lym phographie findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%