1998
DOI: 10.1080/03079459808419293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lymphomagenesis in Marek's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria are (i) hyperproliferation and yet (ii) protection from the default pathway of AICD in vivo (31), (iii) latent MDV infection (because herpesvirus replication in productive infections results in obligate cytolysis [17,82]), and (iv) ubiquity in MD lymphomas. Using only the MAb AV37, we were able to identify cells which fulfill the essential criteria for neoplastic transformation in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The criteria are (i) hyperproliferation and yet (ii) protection from the default pathway of AICD in vivo (31), (iii) latent MDV infection (because herpesvirus replication in productive infections results in obligate cytolysis [17,82]), and (iv) ubiquity in MD lymphomas. Using only the MAb AV37, we were able to identify cells which fulfill the essential criteria for neoplastic transformation in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it would be greatly advantageous (but not critical to the definition of neoplastic transformation in vivo) if we could identify potential immune escape mechanisms of neoplastically transformed MD lymphoma cells. Such mechanisms would be essential in MD because MDV translates proteins in latency (62), and the neoplastically transformed cells must be latently MDV infected (17). Somehow, the neoplastically transformed cells must avoid inducing an immune response to such latent MDV antigens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The various stages of infection with serotype-I virus in genetically susceptible chickens have been described in detail in a number of comprehensive reviews (BIGGS 1973;CALNEK 1980CALNEK , 1985bCALNEK , 1986CALNEK , 1998CALNEK and WITTER 1997;NAZERIAN 1979;PAYNE 1972;PURCHASE 1972;SCHAT 1987;SETTNES 1982). A fairly sharp line demarcates the first two stages, and latent infection in certain cell types is a prerequisite to transformation, but both transforming and latent infections may exist intermixed with cytolytic infections in different cell populations as lymphomas are developing in the later stages.…”
Section: Pattern Of Virus Infection In Susceptible Chickens Infected mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chickens become infected by MDV following inhalation of infected dust via the respiratory route. MDV primarily infects macrophages, B and T cells and it mainly transforms CD4+ T cells although other T cell subtypes are susceptible to transformation 2 , 3 . Generally, MDV life cycle can be divided into the cytolytic phase (2–7 days post-infection - dpi), latent phase (7–10 dpi), late cytolytic phase, and transformation phase 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%