2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1903.07534
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LYRICS: a General Interface Layer to Integrate Logic Inference and Deep Learning

Abstract: In spite of the amazing results obtained by deep learning in many applications, a real intelligent behavior of an agent acting in a complex environment is likely to require some kind of higher-level symbolic inference. Therefore, there is a clear need for the definition of a general and tight integration between low-level tasks, processing sensorial data that can be effectively elaborated using deep learning techniques, and the logic reasoning that allows humans to take decisions in complex environments. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some XAI systems consider counterfactual rule learning and causal signal extractions. Examples of rule learning approaches can include learning from noisy or unstructured data, or learning with constraints [65].…”
Section: The Use Of Knowledge Base For Explainable Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some XAI systems consider counterfactual rule learning and causal signal extractions. Examples of rule learning approaches can include learning from noisy or unstructured data, or learning with constraints [65].…”
Section: The Use Of Knowledge Base For Explainable Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…each one representing one direction of the double implication. For an automatic derivation of the loss associated to the violation of a certain rule, please refer to Marra et al (2019). The Knowledgedriven Active Learning strategy can therefore compute for each sample the associated loss (Eq.…”
Section: A Perfect Example: the Xor-like Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid methods for XAI Integration Logic & Numeric Knowledge-Based Artificial Neural Networks (KBANN) [14] Hu et al [15] Logic Tensor Networks (LTN) [16,17,18,19] Semantic Loss Function (SLF) [20] Lyrics [21] Logic & Numeric & Statistic Markov Logic Networks (MLN) [22] CILP++ [23] Differentiable Inductive Logic Programming (∂ILP) [24] Neural Theorem Prover [25] DeepProbLog [26] Lifted Relational Neural Networks (LRNN) [27] Composition Extraction Rules Pedagogical Saito et al [28] RxREN [29] ALPA [30] Decompositional RuleNet [31] MofN [32] Giles et al [33] KT [34] VI-Analysis [35] RX [36] Núñez et al [37] (SVM-specific) Trees TREPAN [38] Krishnan et al [39] Schetinin et al [40] Injection Knowledge Graph Embedding RESCAL + TRESCAL [41] INS [42] Low-rank Logic Embeddings [43] KALE [44] OSCAR [45] Fig. 1.…”
Section: Symbolic and Sub-symbolic Integration: Main Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%