2022
DOI: 10.1002/cnma.202200020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lysine‐Functionalized SnO2for Efficient CO2Electroreduction into Formate

Abstract: Electroreduction of CO2 to HCOO− can be considered as the most economically valuable process. Herein, we developed lysine‐functionalized SnO2 nanoparticles (SnO2‐lys) as an efficient catalyst for the electroreduction of CO2 into HCOO−. During CO2 electroreduction, SnO2‐lys achieved a Faradaic efficiency for HCOO− of higher than 80% over a wide range of applied potentials from −0.5 V to −2.3 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (vs. RHE). Notably, the partial current density for HCOO− reached as high as −351.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar attempts to optimize the overall process can be seen for the electrochemical CO 2 reduction to formic acid/formate, even though the TRL is currently not as high as it is for the eCO 2 RR to CO. Like CO synthesis, the eCO 2 RR to formic acid/formate requires two electrons (Table 1). The most widely used electrocatalysts are tin (Sn) or tin oxide (SnO x ) (Löwe et al, 2021) and modified Sn‐based materials (Lin et al, 2022). Other reported selective catalysts are indium (In) (Bitar et al, 2016; Hegner et al, 2018), amalgams (Park & Shin, 2021) and bismuth‐based materials (García de Arquer et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2021), whereby the latter shows increased catalysts stability toward alkaline catalyst corrosion (Bienen et al, 2021).…”
Section: Conversion Of Co2 At Gde Using Abiotic Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar attempts to optimize the overall process can be seen for the electrochemical CO 2 reduction to formic acid/formate, even though the TRL is currently not as high as it is for the eCO 2 RR to CO. Like CO synthesis, the eCO 2 RR to formic acid/formate requires two electrons (Table 1). The most widely used electrocatalysts are tin (Sn) or tin oxide (SnO x ) (Löwe et al, 2021) and modified Sn‐based materials (Lin et al, 2022). Other reported selective catalysts are indium (In) (Bitar et al, 2016; Hegner et al, 2018), amalgams (Park & Shin, 2021) and bismuth‐based materials (García de Arquer et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2021), whereby the latter shows increased catalysts stability toward alkaline catalyst corrosion (Bienen et al, 2021).…”
Section: Conversion Of Co2 At Gde Using Abiotic Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Chan et al, the improvement obtained through functionalization by metallic nanoparticles can be understood from different views, such as manipulation of the acid-based properties of the NW surface, change in donor density, catalytic promotion, and extension of the electron depletion region at the junction metal-semiconductor [ 27 ]. SnO 2 NW have already been functionalized with different catalytic nanoparticles such as SiO 2 , palladium, copper, platinum, and lysine to improve the selective detection of other analytes, including acetone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%