2009
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2009.10.080031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

M-ary symbol error outage over Nakagami-m fading channels in shadowing environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the Laplace approximation of Gauss hypergeometric function [13] and a high SNR expression of the Appell hypergeometric function, a similar proposition as in [7] holds: …”
Section: New Tight Approximations For the Sepmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the Laplace approximation of Gauss hypergeometric function [13] and a high SNR expression of the Appell hypergeometric function, a similar proposition as in [7] holds: …”
Section: New Tight Approximations For the Sepmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In [6], we have introduced a new approach to finding an invertible expression of the SEP based on the approximation of the Gauss hypergeometric function for BPSK and Nakagami-m channels. In [7], this has been generalized to larger modulation constellations, i.e. M-PSK and M-QAM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalization of this result, may be stated as follows: (12) Proof: The proof is given in the appendix. The authors in [eqs.…”
Section: A Impact Of Correlation On the Average Size Of C Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In environments where shadowing is not considered, the ergodicity of fast fading allows the utilization of average metrics, such as the average symbol error probability (ASEP), to determine the acceptance of a packet. On the other hand, when shadowing is considered, the ASEP is a function of the shadowing coefficient (i.e., ASEP ij = f (E h fij 2 , h sij )), and the QoS requirement ASEP ij < p * turns out to be equivalent to γ ij > γ 0 [12]. Therefore R i accepts a packet from S j if γ ij dB > γ 0 dB 2 .…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the reliability criteria summarized in the third column of Table 1 provide expressions for the minimum required received power (which depends both on the PHY layer setup and the target QoS) in order for the packet to be accepted at the MAC layer. The inversion of the PER function is crucial for the application of these criteria, while practical ways to deal with this issue for some advanced PHY layer transmission schemes and channel models are described in [4,18], and references therein.…”
Section: Impact Of Phy and Channel Fading On Packet Reception For Qosmentioning
confidence: 99%