2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.anihpb.2004.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

m-order integrals and generalized Itô's formula; the case of a fractional Brownian motion with any Hurst index

Abstract: Given an integer m, a probability measure ν on [0, 1], a process X and a real function g, we define the m-order ν-integral having as integrator X and as integrand g(X). In the case of the fractional Brownian motion B H , for any locally bounded function g, the corresponding integral vanishes for all odd indices m >

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
149
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
149
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same linear regression as in the proof of Theorem 4.1 in [9], we can prove that, when H < 1/2:…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same linear regression as in the proof of Theorem 4.1 in [9], we can prove that, when H < 1/2:…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last property implies that its derivative is a (distribution-valued) stationary field. 3 The one-dimensional case is very different and much simpler, and has been treated in [27]. 4 In other words (informally at least) EB called Lévy area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theorem uses Malliavin calculus, and applies to a random vector with components in the form of Malliavin divergence integrals. After proving Theorem 2.3, the main task in proving (3) is to verify the conditions of Theorem 2.3, which are relatively long and technical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a smooth function f : R → R, we take the 'Simpson's rule' Riemann sum with uniform partition, It can be shown (see [3], or Section 3.1) that this sequence of sums converges in probability when B is fBm with H > 1/10, but in general it does not converge in probability when H ≤ 1/10. In this paper, we consider the particular case of H = 1/10, and show that S S n (t) does converge weakly to a random variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%