2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

M. tuberculosis Sliding β-Clamp Does Not Interact Directly with the NAD+ -Dependent DNA Ligase

Abstract: The sliding β-clamp, an important component of the DNA replication and repair machinery, is drawing increasing attention as a therapeutic target. We report the crystal structure of the M. tuberculosis β-clamp (Mtbβ-clamp) to 3.0 Å resolution. The protein crystallized in the space group C2221 with cell-dimensions a = 72.7, b = 234.9 & c = 125.1 Å respectively. Mtbβ-clamp is a dimer, and exhibits head-to-tail association similar to other bacterial clamps. Each monomer folds into three domains with similar struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 3-D structural model of Mtb α (MtbDnaE1) in complex with a small molecule inhibitor confirmed its structural differences from the human genomic replicase, and thus its promise as a drug target 10 . The crystal structure of the β 2 clamp, the classical processive factor of DNA pol III, has been solved in Mtb at resolutions of 2.89 Å 11 and 3.00 Å 12 , likewise confirming its close homology, including binding sites for α and other subunits, with the β 2 clamp of E. coli . Little, however, is known about the structure and function of the other subunits of Mtb DNA pol III.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A 3-D structural model of Mtb α (MtbDnaE1) in complex with a small molecule inhibitor confirmed its structural differences from the human genomic replicase, and thus its promise as a drug target 10 . The crystal structure of the β 2 clamp, the classical processive factor of DNA pol III, has been solved in Mtb at resolutions of 2.89 Å 11 and 3.00 Å 12 , likewise confirming its close homology, including binding sites for α and other subunits, with the β 2 clamp of E. coli . Little, however, is known about the structure and function of the other subunits of Mtb DNA pol III.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…They have also identified MutL & MutS will also bind to β-clamp in E. coli . However Vandana Kukshal et al 11 reported that M. tuberculosis DNA ligase do not interact with β-clamp and they hypothesized that some other factor may be involved that aids the interaction between these two proteins. Such findings made us curious to determine whether an interaction between HpDNA ligase and Hpβ-clamp exists or some other factor is involved that mediates the interaction between these two proteins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coordinates of the β-clamp structures from different organisms used for comparison were obtained from the PDB. These structures were from E. coli (PDB code: 1MMI, 3BEP) 38 , Thermotoga maritima (PDB code: 1VPK), Streptococcus pyogenes (PDB code: 2AVT) 39 , Streptococcus pneumonia (PDB code: 2AWA), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (PDB code: 3RB9) 11 , Mycobacterium smegmatis (PDB code: 5AH2) 17 , Bacillus subtilis (PDB code: 4TR6) 6 , Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PDB code: 4TR8) 6 and Deinococcus radiodurans (PDB code: 4TRT) 40 . PromalS3D was used to create the structure-based multiple sequence alignment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…β-clamp crystal structures were obtained from various organisms i.e., E. coli (Oakley et al, 2003 ; Burnouf et al, 2004 ), P. aeruginosa (Wolff et al, 2014 ), Streptococcus pyogenes (Argiriadi et al, 2006 ), M. tuberculosis (Gui et al, 2011 ; Kukshal et al, 2012 ; Wolff et al, 2014 ), B. subtillis (Wolff et al, 2014 ), T. maritima (structure 1VPK), Eubacterium rectale (structure 3T0P) , Streptococcus pneumoniae (Argiriadi et al, 2006 ). The crystal structures of β-clamp homologs—Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA)—are also available from Eukaryotes and Archea (to name a few: Homo sapiens (Punchihewa et al, 2012 ), S. cerevisiae (Krishna et al, 1994 ), Sulfolobus solfaraticus (Williams et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Replisome Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%