2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MA20.10 Lung Cancer Prediction Using Deep Learning Software: Validation on Independent Multi-Centre Data

Abstract: discussion with clinic leadership, one site successfully implemented clear, logical follow-up procedures based on staff capacity and clinical guidelines. Conclusion: Our evaluation findings, including key lessons learned and recommendations, add to the growing knowledge base of effective lung cancer screening practices and may be used to inform and guide health systems looking to initiate similar programs, particularly those in low-resource settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The network has nil layers that are fully linked. In Table 1, you'll find more network settings [15] [24] [22].…”
Section: Page 529mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network has nil layers that are fully linked. In Table 1, you'll find more network settings [15] [24] [22].…”
Section: Page 529mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kernel mapping provides a unifying framework for the majority of the model architectures that are commonly used. When the number of images used in the testing process increases, the accuracy of image enhancement must improve [8][9][10].…”
Section: Survey Of the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a CNN trained for the task of Lung Cancer Prediction (LCP-CNN), using the National Lung Sceening Trial (NLST) data, and configured it to specifically identify benign nodules, enabling them to be "ruled out"of unnecessary follow-up with a high degree of certainty. [5] Recently, validating this LCP-CNN on a retrospective UK dataset it was shown that the LCP-CNN outperformed the Brock University model for lung nodule risk categorization [6]. A second study showed that using the LCP-CNN, nodules could be classified into low (5% malignancy treshold) and high-risk (65 % malignancy treshold) categories, with improved accuracy compared to traditional risk prediction models [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%