“…Various studies related to detrital geochronology and geochemistry, lithological transitions, flora and faunal fossils have been reported from this region (Sakai, 1983;Sakai, 1984;Kimura et al, 1985;Matsumaru and Sakai, 1989;Sah and Schleich, 1990;DeCelles et al, 2004), showing diverse opinions on the paleoenvironmental condition. Generally, four distinctive views can be perceived on the paleoenvironment changes as 1) the humid climate prevailed during Cretaceous to Eocene (Neupane and Zhao, 2018;Neupane et al, 2021), 2) there was a paleoenvironmental transition from the pteridophytes dominated wet and humid environment during late Cretaceous (Mohabey et al, 1993;Srivastava, 2011;Prasad et al, 2018) to more humid environment in the entire Eocene revealed by evergreen broad-leaved forest forming coal and carbonaceous shale (Mehrotra, 2003;Srivastava, 2011;Shukla et al, 2014;Spicer et al, 2014;Samant et al, 2020), 3) the paleoclimate during Cretaceous to Eocene had been affected by the Tethys Sea and the Himalayan tectonic uplift rather than the global climate change (Bosboom et al, 2011;Licht et al, 2013;Licht et al, 2014), and 4) the Inter-tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) had driven the Eocene monsoon climate (Boos and Kuang, 2010;Spicer et al, 2016). The poor preservation of late Cretaceous marine and early Cenozoic terrestrial sequences in South Asia has been the main factor causing these debates.…”