1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0736-5845(98)00024-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-component grouping using genetic algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a further explanation, routes selected for parts 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 in Joines et al [28] are different from those of alternative solution 1 generated by the proposed method (compare Tables 3a and b). Similarly, routes selected for parts 5,7,9,11,12,13,14,15 and 16 in Joines et al [28] are different from those of alternative solution 2 generated by using the proposed method (compare Tables 3a and c).…”
Section: Illustration and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a further explanation, routes selected for parts 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 in Joines et al [28] are different from those of alternative solution 1 generated by the proposed method (compare Tables 3a and b). Similarly, routes selected for parts 5,7,9,11,12,13,14,15 and 16 in Joines et al [28] are different from those of alternative solution 2 generated by using the proposed method (compare Tables 3a and c).…”
Section: Illustration and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have considered the condition of routeing flexibility in cell formation [10,11]. Consideration of multi-criteria objectives in cell formation was discussed by Pierreval and Plaquin [12] and Chan et al [13]. Routeing flexibility and multiple objectives were discussed by Zhao and Wu [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 5, the additional numerical Author (year) Problem size Machine Part HPH (Askin et al, 1991) 5×6 5 6 SCA (Kusiak and Cho, 1992) 6×8 6 8 AVV (Yin and Yasuda, 2002) 7×9 7 9 SA (Boctor, 1991) 7×11 7 11 ZODIAC (Cheng et al, 1998) 8×20 8 20 GA (Onwubolu and Mutingi, 2001) 10×15 10 15 SC-TSP (Balakrishnan and Jog, 1995) 12×19 12 19 GA (Chan et al, 1998) 20×35 20 35 ZODIAC (Chandrasekharan and Rajagopalan, 1989) 24×40 24 40 ZODIAC (Chandrasekharan and Rajagopalan, 1987) 40×100 40 100 experiments included 10 test samples, ranging from 5×6 (five machines with six parts) to 40×100 (40 machines with 100 parts), which are adapted from previous literature. The computational results are compared with the cell formation, and Microsoft office Excel 2007 and C are used as the calculation tools.…”
Section: Illustration and Computational Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the machine-part matrix does not show the sequence of operations for each part; hence, it may face a problem when counting the number of intercell trips. Due to the NP-Complete property, the cell formation problem is difficult to solve; thus, numerous studies have applied heuristic methods to solve cell formation problems, such as simulated annealing algorithms (Boctor, 1991;Chen and Srivastava, 1994;Baykasoglu, 2004;Wu et al, 2009), tabu search algorithms (Sun et al, 1995;Onwubolu and Songore, 2000;Belarmino et al, 2001) and genetic algorithms (Gupta et al, 1996;Hwang and Sun, 1996;Lee et al, 1997;Chan et al, 1998;Mak et al, 2000;Onwubolu and Mutingi, 2001;Vin et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2007;Defersha and Chen, 2008;Deljoo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chan et al [6] proposed an approach for cell formation problem by considering machine flexibility and aggregation. Several nonconventional optimization techniques have been used in cell formation problems and in analysing the clusters for total cell movements [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%