2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine direction orientation of high density polyethylene (HDPE): Barrier and optical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the permeability coefficient of unstretched HDPE/GNP composite drastically decreased by 64% due to the two‐dimensional structure and very high aspect ratio of GNPs resulting in an increased tortuosity in the diffusion path of gaseous molecules. The permeability coefficient of stretched (SR = 3) neat HDPE and MWCNTs and CB filled HDPE decreased by about 10%, which is likely attributed to the increased crystallinity of stretched samples . Interestingly, compared with the unstretched HDPE/GNP composite, the permeability coefficient of stretched HDPE/GNP composite at a SR of 3 significantly decreased by about two orders of magnitude to only 4.1 × 10 −16 cm 3 cm/cm 2 s Pa, which is quite close to the theoretical value (3.6 × 10 −16 cm 3 cm/cm 2 s Pa) from a Cussler model ( Eq . )…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, the permeability coefficient of unstretched HDPE/GNP composite drastically decreased by 64% due to the two‐dimensional structure and very high aspect ratio of GNPs resulting in an increased tortuosity in the diffusion path of gaseous molecules. The permeability coefficient of stretched (SR = 3) neat HDPE and MWCNTs and CB filled HDPE decreased by about 10%, which is likely attributed to the increased crystallinity of stretched samples . Interestingly, compared with the unstretched HDPE/GNP composite, the permeability coefficient of stretched HDPE/GNP composite at a SR of 3 significantly decreased by about two orders of magnitude to only 4.1 × 10 −16 cm 3 cm/cm 2 s Pa, which is quite close to the theoretical value (3.6 × 10 −16 cm 3 cm/cm 2 s Pa) from a Cussler model ( Eq . )…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…While in the non-stretched film the melting peak occurs for a temperature about 129.5 o C, the most stretched film exhibits a peak at 133 o C. Moreover, analogously to DR, the melting temperature increases continuously with the stretching ratio increase. The increase of melting temperature in HDPE stretched films was previously observed by Chatterjee et al [8] and attributed to a change of crystal morphology upon stretching. They argued that the average melting temperature of lamellar crystals is lower than that of the fibrillar structure.…”
Section: -2supporting
confidence: 68%
“…To allow the robust transformation of the resin granulates into films and to aid further manufacturing through to the finished products, additives are used to adjust the characteristics of the resin. PE has interesting water barrier properties and mechanical properties [8,9]. EVOH is remarkable for its barrier properties to CO 2 and O 2 gases [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%