2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Adds to Clinical and CAC Assessments in Predicting 10-Year CHD and CVD Deaths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ML method is a form of artificial intelligence, and does not make a priori assumptions about causality, which distinguishes it from regression-based methods. ML had been widely used in the diagnosis and prognosis of CAD [ 12 , 16 , 17 ]. However, no studies developed a ML prediction model that can be used to predict all-cause mortality in CAD patients with AF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ML method is a form of artificial intelligence, and does not make a priori assumptions about causality, which distinguishes it from regression-based methods. ML had been widely used in the diagnosis and prognosis of CAD [ 12 , 16 , 17 ]. However, no studies developed a ML prediction model that can be used to predict all-cause mortality in CAD patients with AF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) is usually used to develop a predictive model to predict various results, and the computer algorithms were applied into ML to identify patterns in large databases with multiple variables [ 9 12 ]. Motwani et al developed a ML model for the prediction of 5-year all-cause mortality in patients with only CAD [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although to date 18 F-NaF coronary PET research was predominantly focused on subjects with established disease, this imaging modality was also shown to identify active atherosclerotic disease across the entire spectrum of patients with subclinical, suspected, and established coronary artery disease. While in patients with advanced atherosclerosis 18 F-NaF PET clearly outperforms clinical characteristics and scores in risk stratification, it remains to be studied whether it can add to the alreadyrobust risk prediction in patients with the suspected disease [73]. Similar to coronary PET imaging, active calcification processes in valvular, great, and peripheral vessel disease would likely also benefit from advanced motion correction techniques and novel uptake measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses information that can be easily provided, such as age, sex, and pre-hospitalize diagnosis. Previous scoring systems [4,11,15] , including a recently reported deep learning model [29] , require laboratory or radiographic ndings as the main variables. Although such models can be helpful in fully equipped medical facilities, they initially consume a certain amount of medical resources and time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%