2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-aided scenario-based seismic drift measurement for RC moment frames using visual features of surface damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values in the fourth and sixth columns of Table 3 are calculated by multiplying the sensitivity value with the positive or negative percentage. Noteworthy to mention that previous studies have widely incorporated symbolic regression method 24,28,34,[39][40][41][42][43][44]86,96 or machine learningbased models 45,46,92,94,95 for correlating the image-derived parameters to the level of damage in the structural components. The machine learning-based models are conventionally used when very complex relationship exists between the predictors.…”
Section: Plan Iii: Modeling By Two Gfds and Aspect Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values in the fourth and sixth columns of Table 3 are calculated by multiplying the sensitivity value with the positive or negative percentage. Noteworthy to mention that previous studies have widely incorporated symbolic regression method 24,28,34,[39][40][41][42][43][44]86,96 or machine learningbased models 45,46,92,94,95 for correlating the image-derived parameters to the level of damage in the structural components. The machine learning-based models are conventionally used when very complex relationship exists between the predictors.…”
Section: Plan Iii: Modeling By Two Gfds and Aspect Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was later expanded to encompass generic joints, including those characterized by ductile behavior. 46 According to the above mentioned research history, none of the previous studies has focused on earthquake-induced peak IDR identification of RC columns using GFDs of surface crack textures. Moreover, based on the aforementioned research background, there exists a knowledge gap regarding the automated seismic loss quantification of RC columns using crack image complexity parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fractal dimension, has been also employed by Hamidia and Gangizadeh for loss measurement 57 and residual stiffness estimation 58 of seismically damaged nonductile RCMFs. Also, Hamidia et al 59,60 employed machine learning regression models for the loss estimation of RCMFs based on information on cracking length and crushing density. All those studies have used a databank of beam-column joints where the damage is localized in the beam and joints and not in the columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the length and angle of crack patterns and the extent of crushed areas are some image-based features that can be captured from the exposed face of damaged elements. [15][16][17][18] Recently, Asjodi et al 19 investigated the spatial concentration of cracked zones and crushed areas over the 2D space of RCSWs. They illustrated a strong correlation between the evolution of surface damage (i.e., crack pattern length and crushed areas) and external loading that can be used for the drift prediction of RCSWs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous studies have used the fractal dimension as a strong damage indicator, the recent development in image processing techniques has introduced more interpretable damage features. Specifically, the length and angle of crack patterns and the extent of crushed areas are some image‐based features that can be captured from the exposed face of damaged elements 15–18 . Recently, Asjodi et al 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%